<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New features for the new year!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/</link>
	<description>The official Project Wonderful blog. Everybody Wins!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:20:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bengo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Hi, I promised to share my reaction. I like to road test everything for a while before deciding, but so far everything seems like a positive move, and I think new users will learn the ropes more rapidly, meaning they won&#039;t be functioning half blind for months. Definitely no complaints.

I&#039;m sorry that sounds so bland, but it probably means that everything is going to work out well.

Best,
Bengo

Now where the hell is that SUBMIT COMMENT button!?!? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I promised to share my reaction. I like to road test everything for a while before deciding, but so far everything seems like a positive move, and I think new users will learn the ropes more rapidly, meaning they won&#8217;t be functioning half blind for months. Definitely no complaints.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry that sounds so bland, but it probably means that everything is going to work out well.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Bengo</p>
<p>Now where the hell is that SUBMIT COMMENT button!?!? <img src='http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom - 

When you apply, you&#039;re approved at the site level: so if you&#039;ve got a site with a variety of things, you can create ad boxes on your site for these different sections, and each can have a separate category.

We picked the initial categories, but when that happened an email went out saying &quot;Hey, here&#039;s what we chose, and here&#039;s links to change the categories if you want!&quot;  Publishers can change their categories at any time.

So to answer your question: if you&#039;ve multiple ad boxes per site, then you can have different categories for each of those ad boxes, as targeted as the sections on your site are.  And of course, you&#039;re in charge of the criteria.

I hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>When you apply, you&#8217;re approved at the site level: so if you&#8217;ve got a site with a variety of things, you can create ad boxes on your site for these different sections, and each can have a separate category.</p>
<p>We picked the initial categories, but when that happened an email went out saying &#8220;Hey, here&#8217;s what we chose, and here&#8217;s links to change the categories if you want!&#8221;  Publishers can change their categories at any time.</p>
<p>So to answer your question: if you&#8217;ve multiple ad boxes per site, then you can have different categories for each of those ad boxes, as targeted as the sections on your site are.  And of course, you&#8217;re in charge of the criteria.</p>
<p>I hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-139</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been interested in PW basically from the moment it appeared, big fan of the whole idea, so when I set up my new site last year I wanted to put PW ads on it. After a couple months work I signed up, then clicked &quot;become a publisher&quot; and found out sites had to be *approved* first. As it was coming across a bit sketchy at the time, I figured I should do a bit more work on it first. Ended up several more months&#039; worth.

It&#039;s not a &quot;site about X&quot;, just &quot;my site&quot;, with a wide variety of things there and in planning, which also didn&#039;t help the appearance for if it was to be judged. I finally submitted it yesterday though, hoping the ready parts wouldn&#039;t be undermined by the unready parts or those parts I never even planned to put ads on at all. At the same time I saw the news about categories, which I was in 2 minds about. And in looking for more info whilst nervously awaiting judgement, saw this blog entry today.

It&#039;s sounding quite a bit like you&#039;re saying that *you* guys are the ones who pick the categories, and much worse for people like me, that it&#039;s *one* category *per site*, not just per ad box? As I really wanted to have separate boxes per section, targetted to different groups, that would be a disaster for my site, and the idea is making me feel very gloomy on top of the tension from waiting for approval.

As for the idea in general, I think that like other PW search criteria, some advertisers may well fluff it if they aren&#039;t given prominent advice about the different ways it could be applied, which would *also* be bad for many publishers too. If everyone uses it well it could be pretty good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been interested in PW basically from the moment it appeared, big fan of the whole idea, so when I set up my new site last year I wanted to put PW ads on it. After a couple months work I signed up, then clicked &#8220;become a publisher&#8221; and found out sites had to be *approved* first. As it was coming across a bit sketchy at the time, I figured I should do a bit more work on it first. Ended up several more months&#8217; worth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a &#8220;site about X&#8221;, just &#8220;my site&#8221;, with a wide variety of things there and in planning, which also didn&#8217;t help the appearance for if it was to be judged. I finally submitted it yesterday though, hoping the ready parts wouldn&#8217;t be undermined by the unready parts or those parts I never even planned to put ads on at all. At the same time I saw the news about categories, which I was in 2 minds about. And in looking for more info whilst nervously awaiting judgement, saw this blog entry today.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sounding quite a bit like you&#8217;re saying that *you* guys are the ones who pick the categories, and much worse for people like me, that it&#8217;s *one* category *per site*, not just per ad box? As I really wanted to have separate boxes per section, targetted to different groups, that would be a disaster for my site, and the idea is making me feel very gloomy on top of the tension from waiting for approval.</p>
<p>As for the idea in general, I think that like other PW search criteria, some advertisers may well fluff it if they aren&#8217;t given prominent advice about the different ways it could be applied, which would *also* be bad for many publishers too. If everyone uses it well it could be pretty good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfruh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>jfruh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan!

Thanks for the quick response!  Excellent advice, I shall take it.

I approve of the fact that you&#039;ve spelled the &quot;humour&quot; tag all Canadian-y, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan!</p>
<p>Thanks for the quick response!  Excellent advice, I shall take it.</p>
<p>I approve of the fact that you&#8217;ve spelled the &#8220;humour&#8221; tag all Canadian-y, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh, and thanks for the suggestion!

Right now we&#039;re using the tags as a way of adding more detail to the categories, so you could be categorized &quot;Comics and Manga&quot; and then add the tag &quot;humor&quot; and &quot;comedy&quot; and &quot;laffsahoy&quot;.  On the other hand, an (excellent!) site like yours is really on the boundry, so you may want to put yourself in the &quot;Humour&quot; category and tag yourself &quot;comics&quot;.

When advertisers search they can choose more than one category to look at, so they could look at both &quot;Comics and Manga&quot; and &quot;Humour&quot; sites at the same time, if they have an advertisement that would fit them both well!  This helps to minimize the &quot;OH GOSH WHAT IF I&#039;M IN THE WRONG CATEGORY&quot; fear.  As long as your category is reasonable, you should be in good shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh, and thanks for the suggestion!</p>
<p>Right now we&#8217;re using the tags as a way of adding more detail to the categories, so you could be categorized &#8220;Comics and Manga&#8221; and then add the tag &#8220;humor&#8221; and &#8220;comedy&#8221; and &#8220;laffsahoy&#8221;.  On the other hand, an (excellent!) site like yours is really on the boundry, so you may want to put yourself in the &#8220;Humour&#8221; category and tag yourself &#8220;comics&#8221;.</p>
<p>When advertisers search they can choose more than one category to look at, so they could look at both &#8220;Comics and Manga&#8221; and &#8220;Humour&#8221; sites at the same time, if they have an advertisement that would fit them both well!  This helps to minimize the &#8220;OH GOSH WHAT IF I&#8217;M IN THE WRONG CATEGORY&#8221; fear.  As long as your category is reasonable, you should be in good shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfruh</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>jfruh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-136</guid>
		<description>I realize that this is probably very very much a nontrivial tweak, but would it be possible to be able to assign more than one category to a site?  For instance, you guys categorized my site in the &quot;Comics and Manga&quot; category, which is perfectly correct, but it would ALSO be perfectly correct to put it in the humor category, and OH MY GOD WHAT IF I AM MISSING OUT ON THE HUMOR ADVERTISERS, you know what I&#039;m saying.

I hate to gripe because Project Wondeful is in general awesome and I love it and you!  But it is a suggestion to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that this is probably very very much a nontrivial tweak, but would it be possible to be able to assign more than one category to a site?  For instance, you guys categorized my site in the &#8220;Comics and Manga&#8221; category, which is perfectly correct, but it would ALSO be perfectly correct to put it in the humor category, and OH MY GOD WHAT IF I AM MISSING OUT ON THE HUMOR ADVERTISERS, you know what I&#8217;m saying.</p>
<p>I hate to gripe because Project Wondeful is in general awesome and I love it and you!  But it is a suggestion to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doompuppet</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2009/01/new-features-for-the-new-year/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Doompuppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/?p=29#comment-135</guid>
		<description>The categories update rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The categories update rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

