<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogject Wonderful - The Official Project Wonderful Blog &#187; click fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/category/click-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com</link>
	<description>The official Project Wonderful blog. Everybody Wins!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The fight against click fraud drags on&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2008/02/the-fight-against-click-fraud-drags-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2008/02/the-fight-against-click-fraud-drags-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[click fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2008/02/27/the-fight-against-click-fraud-drags-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at the Freakonomics blog, they&#8217;ve been talking about click fraud. It began with this alarming report that 16.6% of all ad clicks are fraudulent across the industry and that in the case of Cost-per-Click advertisers like Google and Yahoo it was 28.3%. They&#8217;ve since followed it up with a post where Google explains that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at the Freakonomics blog, they&#8217;ve been talking about click fraud. It began with <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/the-rise-of-click-fraud-is-everyone-on-the-internet-a-criminal/">this alarming report</a> that 16.6% of all ad clicks are fraudulent across the industry and that in the case of Cost-per-Click advertisers like Google and Yahoo it was 28.3%. They&#8217;ve since <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/google-and-click-fraud-behind-the-numbers/">followed it up</a> with a post where Google explains that their algorithms are quite good and that they estimate that only 0.02% of clicks that pass through the network are fraudulent.</p>
<p>The challenge for the reader is to determine whether to believe the report of the &#8220;independent auditor&#8221; ClickForensics who <a href="http://www.clickforensics.com/Pages/FAQ.aspx">offer third party click validation services</a> and so have an incentive to skew high or to believe Google who, of course, <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/02/meet-click-quality-team.html">have an incentive to skew low</a>. In the end it doesn&#8217;t really matter, as long there is a mechanism to mechanically pay out money for clicks (or displays) there will be an arms race where shady publishers try to game the system.</p>
<p>Guys, this is exactly why we decided to stop selling advertising on these ridiculously open-to-abuse pricing models! <a href="http://www.projectwonderful.com/advertisewithus.php">There&#8217;s a Better Way!</a></p>
<p>-Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogjectwonderful.com/2008/02/the-fight-against-click-fraud-drags-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

